Vaccines Have Not Saved Millions of Lives
Author - Larry A. Law
The reason the U.S. government gave vaccine manufacturers immunity against liability is because they convinced the Reagan White House that vaccines could not be made safe and that they would always injure certain people. According to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., vaccine makers were given blanket immunity "no matter how grievous the injury, no matter how reckless the behavior, no matter how shoddy their manufacturing and testing processes and the reason we gave them that liability shield is because they were able to convince the Reagan White House that vaccines could not be made safe. They're going to injure certain people." So, why is there even an argument about whether vaccines are safe and effective? Vaccine makers admitted in 1986 that vaccines could not be made safe for everyone and the government agreed with them! The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) trumpets that vaccine injuries are rare—only 1 in 1 million. But that is a blatant propaganda lie. The CDC studied the question in 2010 and published the Lazarus Study which revealed that the real-world injury rate is 2.6%, which equates to 1 in 37 people!
Vaccine Injuries Are Common But Underreported
The Lazarus Study authors noted that "Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported ... fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported." They also stressed that "Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of 'problem' drugs and vaccines that endanger public health." More than half of the American population have chronic diseases that might make them more prone to vaccine injury (as we saw with COVID-19), so arguing that underlying health problems are to blame for vaccine injuries is hardly a solid argument. The question is, if so many people are at risk of vaccine injury, why aren't we making sure vaccines are as safe as they can possibly get?
Vaccines Did Not Save Millions From Infectious Disease
In 2000, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health
reviewed vital statistics data to assess to what degree vaccines and other interventions contributed to the massive decrease in infectious disease mortality in the 20th century. Surprisingly, medical interventions such as antibiotics and vaccines were found to have played only a very small role. The explanation for the improvement in public health was improvements in nutrition and sanitation. The McKinlay and McKinlay study
published in 1977 documented that less than 1% of the decline in mortality from infectious disease in the U.S. in the 20th century could be attributed to modern medical intervention, including drugs, vaccines, and surgeries.
COVID-19 Vaccine
A Cleveland Clinic study
published in December 2022 concluded that:
1. The COVID-19 shots provided protection for a couple of months, after which effectiveness waned precipitously, and after approximately seven months, the vaccinated were more susceptible to COVID than before (negative efficacy).
2. The risk of COVID-19 infection increased with each vaccine dose. Those who had received two doses were 2.6 times more likely to get infected than the unvaccinated, and those with three or more doses had a 3.4 times higher risk.
3. The bivalent COVID-19 booster was only 29% effective in preventing infection during the timeframe when it was well-matched to the circulating strain. When the circulating strain mutated, as it always and frequently did, there was virtually no effectiveness.
CDC data reveals that by April 2022, most COVID deaths were occurring among the jabbed and boosted, and this even though numbers were artificially suppressed because they only counted people as 'vaccinated' or 'boosted' if they were at least two weeks out from their last shot (six weeks out from their initial COVID-19 shot).
The Kaiser Family Foundation
reported that "In fall 2021, about 3 in 10 adults dying of COVID-19 were vaccinated or boosted. But by January 2022 ... about 4 in 10 deaths were vaccinated or boosted. By April 2022 ... data show that about 6 in 10 adults dying of COVID-19 were vaccinated or boosted, and that's remained true through at least August 2022."
Turtles All The Way Down
A great book for those who want the unsullied truth about specific vaccines is called
Turtles All The Way Down
. The authors chose to remain anonymous to avoid being smeared and having the scientific discussion railroaded. They state the following in their book description:
"
If you are reading this, you are probably aware of the fierce debate surrounding vaccinations and looking for information that will allow you to make the best decisions for yourself and your loved ones. Whether you are a parent or a parent to be, sorting through the many arguments on vaccines can be daunting. Still, you need an answer, a definitive one, to the crucial question: Who has it right in the great vaccine debate – the critics, who claim that vaccines often cause serious harm, or the medical establishment, which tells us that vaccines are safe and effective and the science is settled?
Rest assured, you have come to the right place. Turtles All the Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth
will resolve the vaccine question for you, once and for all. By the time you finish reading, not only will you see the answer clearly for yourself, you will also have the scientific references and specific quotes at your disposal that prove it – more than 1,200 of them – all from mainstream scientific papers and textbooks, the official publications of relevant government agencies, or manufacturers’ documents.
The book consolidates a great deal of information (accompanied by detailed analysis) that is scattered in hundreds of medical articles, books, and websites. All discussion is presented in clear and easy-to-understand language, so no medical education is required. It presents several original concepts in addition to laying a robust scientific foundation for the more established ones."
Some of the fundamental vaccine safety issues covered in the book are:
- How is safety demonstrated before a new vaccine is licensed? What technique do vaccine manufacturers use in clinical trials to make vaccines appear safer than they actually are?
- What “last ditch” technique is employed when the above one cannot be, and what are its grave (and damning) ethical implications?
- What is the scientific foundation for the safety of vaccinations, and what practical tools does this body of science provide physicians with to anticipate, diagnose, and treat vaccine injury?
- What fundamental flaws are built into vaccine adverse events reporting systems, and how are these systems used (or misused) by health authorities to support their safety claims?
- What kinds of post-marketing vaccine studies are conducted, and how can they be manipulated by researchers to produce “favorable” outcomes?
- Why would researchers want to skew vaccine research, and how could skewed results be promulgated by the scientific community?
- Why would medical journals publish faulty vaccine science? What is the role of the famed “peer review” in this process?
- What are “the studies that will never be done” by the medical establishment and how long have they resisted doing them? (Hint: more than 100 years!)
- What key CDC-recommended childhood vaccination guidelines were arbitrarily set, without an adequate scientific basis?
- What is herd immunity, and how does it apply (or not) to the vaccines on the childhood schedule?
- What role did vaccines actually play in the historical decline of infectious disease?
- Was the paralysis associated with polio actually caused by the poliovirus? Is there a better explanation for the great paralysis epidemics of the 20th century? What are the “19 polio mysteries”?
Recent Posts












