by Larry Law
Most autoimmune and neurological conditions will never be seen in such a short observation window. So, the vaccine is declared safe and effective but in fact the “test” is never conducted so the conclusion is a lie. But it is repeated so often by authoritative doctors trained (and often subsidized) by the pharmaceutical industry that the public and media have no reason to question it.
Dr. Rachael Ross cohosted the Emmy Award-winning TV show, The Doctors. In 2016, she changed her opinion about vaccine safety stating, “I have witnessed the vaccine schedule grow from 16 doses of 4 vaccines from birth to six years old when I was a child, to the current recommendation of 49 doses of 14 vaccines between birth and age six, and 69 doses of 16 vaccines between birth and the age of eighteen…and we’ve been giving them on-time, sometimes five shots a day to help kids “catch-up,” and all without question. Medical school taught us all to do so. I guess I can’t help but wonder if there’s a connection between the fact that when we had to give fewer vaccines we had fewer childhood diseases. It is only human to wonder. We had fewer learning disabilities, less asthma, less autism, and less diabetes. Autism in particular was 1 in 500 in the late seventies and it has now skyrocketed to 1 in 50. Why so many? Why so soon?”
In 2017, Dr. Daniel Neides, medical director of the Cleveland Clinic Wellness Institute, wrote about whether the current vaccination program was worth it. “Some of the vaccines have helped reduce the incidence of childhood communicable diseases. That is great news. But not at the expense of neurological diseases like autism and ADHD increasing at alarming rates.” The linear relationship between the increase in vaccine doses and the rise in autism seems graphically very clear when evaluated over the last 60 years.
Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a board-certified nephrologist stated, “Doctors today are given extensive training on how to talk to “hesitant” parents – how to frighten them by vastly inflating the risks during natural infection. They are trained on the necessity of twisting parents’ arms to conform, or fire them from their practices. Doctors are trained that nothing bad should be said about any vaccine, period.” Did you know that some doctors will terminate you from their practice if you refuse their vaccine recommendations?
Dr. Robert Mendelsohn was the most famous pediatrician in the U.S. during the 1970s and 1980s. He wrote, “although I administered them myself during my early years of practice, I have become a steadfast opponent of mass inoculations because of the myriad hazards they present…I know, as I write about the dangers of mass immunization, that it is a concept that you may find difficult to accept. Immunizations have been so artfully and aggressively marketed that most parents believe them to be the “miracle” that has eliminated many once-feared diseases. Consequently, for anyone to oppose them borders on the foolhardy. For a pediatrician to attack what has become the “bread and butter” of pediatric practice is equivalent to a priest’s denying the infallibility of the pope.”
Dr. Mendelsohn passed away in 1988. Things have gotten far worse since then. He would surely be appalled that county and state governments are mandating mass inoculations throughout the United States. This violation of personal freedom is especially disconcerting. It is all done supposedly for the “greater, common good” – herd immunity is the medical term. But it is socialist medicine intruding on the individual rights of parents and children alike. It is legal for a woman “to choose” to terminate the life of the baby she is caring but it is not legal for a woman (or man) to choose to preserve life by not injecting something they view as a poison. Incredibly twisted logic!
One last note about the concerns with mass immunizations. J.B. Handley, in his book, How to End the Autism Epidemic, shared that studies are being published demonstrating that getting mild diseases and allowing the body to fight infections actually helps strengthen the immune system in ways we didn’t realize. Scientists in Canada reported in 2005, “infections may play a paradoxical role in cancer development with chronic infections often being tumorigenic and acute infections being antagonistic to cancer.” This means cancer risk is lowered because of exposure to natural, childhood infectious diseases. A 2010 study reported that having mumps could “make someone less susceptible to ovarian cancer.” A 1998 study found that children who had measles and other “febrile infectious childhood diseases had lower cancer risk as adults.” For more information on vaccines, see my book.