Growing Demand for Unvaccinated Blood

Larry A. Law 

There are no studies on whether blood donated from people who have had the mRNA COVID-19 shots represent a risk to unvaccinated people who receive it in a blood transfusion. But a growing number of people refuse to take the chance and are asking for blood from unvaccinated people. The parents of a 4-month-old baby in New Zealand, Will Savage-Reeves, required extra blood for surgery to repair a heart valve. While unvaccinated blood is available, the doctors and hospital refused to grant their request. The case was heard in a New Zealand court. The court sided with the hospital; the doctors took guardianship of the baby and performed the surgery with vaccinated blood despite the parent's protest. Similar things have happened in the United States when parents have fought hospitals as they refuse to have their children undergo chemotherapy. It is disturbing to witness parental rights ignored in favor of a medical system that claims to have priority and absolute authority over what is best for children.  

Hospital's Refusal of Family's Request

There is a whole area that can be categorized as parental abuse of children requiring state intervention, and it requires careful delineation and restriction. Parental rights are virtually non-existent in communist and socialist countries. Sadly, it is also becoming the same in the west. The Prime Minister of New Zealand is an example of one of the most heinous, COVID-19 medical tyranny enforcers in the world. Back to the case of the 4-month baby: even though unvaccinated blood was available, the hospital felt that agreeing to use unvaccinated blood could be interpreted as admission that vaccinated blood was not safe, and that this 'admission' could lead to many others requesting unvaccinated blood. Keeping up appearances that vaccines were safe and effective was their number one motivation. So, this reasonable request was denied and misconstrued into a case where the government could forcefully overturn parental rights in support of their own unethical agenda to save face. The New York Times exuded the typical mainstream media conspiracy rhetoric when they reported on the case.

"The case, and the family's flawed scientific arguments, highlight the continuing dangers of online misinformation and conspiracist narratives, experts say. The dispute has 'become a cause celebre in the most toxic way,' prompting a spike in hate speech on fringe platforms where conspiracty theories run rife, said Sanjana Hattotuwa, a researcher at the Disinformation Project, a New Zealand monitoring group." A similar case occurred in Italy with a 2-year-old son's heart surgery. 

Is the Blood Supply Safe?

Pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole compared the situation of vaccinated blood with the HIV-tainted blood used in transfusions in the 1980s. "I have clots from unvaccinated deceased that were transfused and formed large clots post-transfusion and died. No blood bank is checking. 'One cannot find, that for which they do not look.' This is akin to blood banks and hemophiliacs and HIV in the 1980s. It may not be a problem. However, it may be. There are assays academically available to check for circulating spike protein. It is criminal negligence to not assure the safety of the blood supply based on bureaucratic declarations without scientific explorations." 

As noted in Encyclopedia.com, "In fact, in the early years of the disease, many of the people who contracted AIDS were infected through blood transfusions. Because it took more than five years to develop a test to check for AIDS in blood before it was used in a transfusion, many people got the disease in hospitals. The AIDS epidemic continued to grow in Africa and Asia during the 1990s and even in the early 21st century because many nations were slow to adopt blood testing." 

Is It Your Right to Receive "Unvaccinated Blood?"

Currently, blood donation centers may ask about vaccines their donors have received, but there is no guarantee that this information will be passed on to blood-recipients. The only options appear to be direct donations where a donor donates blood for a specified receiver. Unfortunately, these are usually limited to cases where matched blood is unavailable due to extremely rare blood types. Autologous donations, or self-donation where you donate blood for your own use, is another option. Both direct and autologous require a Red Cross Special Collections Order form submitted by your doctor. A Safe Blood donation campaign has been formed in hopes of creating an mRNA-free blood bank. Currently they only act as a resource to match donors with those in need of blood. None of the hundreds of clinics are yet willing to be mentioned as a source of mRNA-free blood because of the fear of reprisals. However, the campaign is committed to establishing a worldwide network of such clinics. Freedom of choice is a fight worth waging.