Pandemic Vaccine Concerns

Larry A. Law

Pushing for mandatory ​COVID-19 vaccination is paving the way for non-consensual medical experimentation on the general public. World leaders have warned that social distancing, mask wearing, travel restrictions and other measures will become part of our “new normal.” They sold the vaccine as a way to end the pandemic and return us to normal. But it cannot do that since it has only been evaluated for its ability to lessen COVID-19 symptoms. The vaccine does not reduce the risk of infection, hospitalization or death.

Some COVID-19 vaccines have been granted emergency use authorization, but they still haven’t completed Stage 3 clinical trials. Data won’t even be collected until 24 months after initial injections which began in December 2020. So these vaccines are still entirely experimental. Their adverse side effects are relatively unknown. It’s also unknown whether they might affect fertility — a real concern since the vaccine triggers the body to produce antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and spike proteins in turn contain syncytin-homologous proteins that are essential for the formation of placenta. If a woman’s immune system starts reacting against syncytin-1, then there is a real possibility she could become infertile.

​To make matters worse, Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine contains polyethylene glycol (PEG), and studies have shown 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance. This suggests PEG may trigger fatal allergic reactions in many who receive the vaccine.

The dangers associated with inserting foreign DNA (mRNA) have never been tested. Problems leading to autoimmune disease, cancer, and unforeseen complications should be evaluated before this experimental technology, which has never been used before, is injected indiscriminantly into millions of unsuspecting people around the planet.
​
Click here** to watch this fascinating expose on the risks associated with the pandemic vaccines. **Unfortunately, the video I linked here looks like it was deleted. One has to wonder why they would keep education from the public. They say it is to protect us from misinformation.  But I say it is our right to make our own decisions as to what we believe based on the scientific education we find.