Larry A. Law
She felt it necessary to take a prudent, precautionary step to protect the health of their school community. The Pfizer and Moderna experimental vaccines do not complete clinical safety trials until 2023. Efficacy data and side-effect risks for these mRNA vaccines will not be fully known until then. The statement in her email causing widespread controversy, which was even addressed by the White House press secretary on April 27th, was this:
"Tens of thousands of women all over the world have recently been reporting adverse reproductive issues simply from being in close proximity with those who have received any one of the COVID-19 injections, e.g., irregular menses, bleeding, miscarriages, post-menopausal hemorrhaging, and amenorrhea (complete loss of menstruation). No one knows exactly what may be causing these irregularities, but it appears that those who have received the injections may be transmitting something from their bodies to those with whom they come in contact. Until more is known, we must err on the side of caution when it comes to the welfare of our students and the school team."
The pharmaceutical backlash was intense. Thousands of mainstream media comments attempted to dismiss this statement as unscientific misinformation. None of them mentioned the 85,926 reports of adverse effects ranging from death to hundreds of life-threatening symptoms recorded on the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) maintained by the Center for Disease Control (CDC). And peer-reviewed research indicates that VAERS captures a mere 1% of actual events. The actual number of events is several magnitudes higher than the conservative numbers offered by VAERS (possibly as high as 8 million adverse events!).
None of the negative comments mentioned Pfizer's own mRNA vaccine clinical trial study design which warns against proximity (shared air inhalation or skin contact) between vaccine participants and the un-vaccinated as a possible "Vector of Harm" (a mechanism for causing harm). Just touching the skin of a vaccinated person or inhaling the same air could generate an adverse event in an un-vaccinated individual exposed to a vaccinated person. (Reference: "A Phase 1/2/3 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals.") Risks associated with breastfeeding and touching skin during conception are all explicitly cited as potential concerns by Pfizer. After reading Pfizer's own study, it is clear for anyone to see that Leila Centner's actions were not without scientific basis.
It is well-known that people getting vaccinated with the flu vaccine will shed the virus 4 times as much as someone who caught the flu. Vaccinated people are super spreaders. Modern mRNA vaccines are designed using genetically-engineered processes that do not depend on a living virus and so do not cause shedding in the same way as older technology vaccines. However, they do contribute to microvessicle shedding. This type of shedding represents a more serious and persistent risk than that caused by first-generation vaccines. These microvessicles are also known as exosomes. It is scientifically plausible for vaccinated individuals to shed mRNA and related molecules induced by the vaccination to non-vaccinated individuals via these exosomes. This would cause symptoms similar to those experienced by the vaccinated person. Proponents of mRNA technology emphasize a one-way street of DNA being copied into RNA and thus minimize the risk of mRNA affecting people. They conveniently forget to mention how this claim was debunked in the 1970s with the discovery of the enzyme reverse transcriptase. Reverse transcriptase is able to transcribe or write RNA back into DNA. It is a two-way street inside the cells and inserting mRNA represents a huge experimental risk of altering the human genome within the body.
So, say a prayer for Leila Centner because she is being unfairly and viciously attacked for courageously watching out for her school. The COVID-19 vaccinator proponents are not interested in a discussion. They only want submission. Just this week, Dr. Mercola was forced to remove from his website any recommendations for using zinc, vitamin D, or other natural supplements to fight COVID-19. Freedom of speech is already hanging by a thread. Some people are asleep to the crisis and others are ignoring it, hoping it will go away. In the end, the biggest problem may not just be the loss of our freedom to exempt ourselves from unwanted vaccinations.