Larry A. Law
Ali Ellebedy, PhD., an associate professor of pathology and immunology of medicine and molecular microbiology, and senior author said in a news release, "Last fall, there were reports that antibodies wane quickly after infection with the virus that causes COVID-19, and mainstream media interpreted that to mean that immunity was not long-lived. But that's a misinterpretation of the data. It's normal for antibody levels to go down after acute infection, but they don't go down to zero; they plateau. Here, we found antibody-producing cells in people 11 months after the first symptoms. These cells will live and produce antibodies for the rest of the people's lives. That's strong evidence for long-lasting immunity." The Biden administration and the Center for Disease Control (CDC) have failed to exclude this category of people (millions of people who have gotten and recovered from Covid-19) in any of their mask, social distancing and vaccine recommendations. These people pose absolutely no risk as they cannot get the virus again or give it to anyone. The vaccine is completely unnecessary for this group of people and observations are appearing in the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) that they are 2 to 3 times more likely to have an adverse event with a jab because they already had COVID-19. An international survey of 2,002 people who were coronavirus survivors and got their first jab of COVID-19 vaccine found "significantly increased incidence and severity" of side effects after receiving the vaccine. According to researchers, the findings should prompt health officials to reevaluate their vaccination recommendations for people who've had COVID-19: "People with prior COVID-19 exposure were largely excluded from the vaccine trials and, as a result, the safety and reactogenicity of the vaccines in this population have not been previously fully evaluated. For the first time, this study demonstrates a significant association between prior COVID-19 infection and a significantly higher incidence and severity of self-reported side effects after vaccination for COVID-19." Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, a cardiac surgeon, warned the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that "clear and present danger" exists for those who have had COVID-19 and subsequently get vaccinated. He described the case of Benjamin Goodman, a 32-year-old New Yorker who died within one day of getting the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine. "There will be many more in the coming months as we carelessly and indiscrimanately vaccinate the already infected, millions a day...It's a near certainty." The issue involves the viral antigens that remain in the body after a person is naturally infected. The immune response reactivated by the COVID-19 vaccine may trigger inflammation in tissues where the viral antigens are present. The inner lining of blood vessels, the lungs and the brain may be particularly at risk of such inflammation and damage. There are now (as of May 10) over 4,434 deaths from COVID-19 vaccines and 235,000 injuries. More deaths have occurred from COVID vaccines in 4 months than have occurred in the previous 20 years from ALL vaccines! Dr. Peter McCullough was interviewed this week by Tucker Carlson. This is the first time someone in mainstream media has opened a significant scientific discussion into the problems with vaccines. Tucker is very surprised at what he learns (I will highlight just three points):
1) The FDA clinical trials for Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and AstraZeneca all excluded the following people from their randomized vaccine clinical trials: COVID recovered, suspected COVID recovered, people with COVID antibodies, pregnant women, and women with childbearing potential. If these people were never safety tested during the clinical trials and there is no safety data for them, why are we risking their health by giving them the shot? The only vaccine we give pregnant moms is the DPT and flu shot which both utilize an inactivated virus (lowest possible risk). Why are we giving them shots that force their body to create a pathogenic spike protein? This is high risk for complications and something we have never done before. 2) Health officials want to give a "green passport" to those who have been vaccinated. Why aren't we giving a "gold passport" to those who have natural immunity as a result of having had the virus? They are the only ones who are 100% guaranteed to not get the virus a second time nor pass it on. They can show natural immunity by getting an antibody test or a T-cell test. Both tests are proof of innate immunity. Vaccines don't make people immune. They only lessen symptoms if you get the coronavirus. Gold beats green hands down for safety and efficacy! 3) As a result of the Nazi atrocities conducted in concentration camps, the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II guaranteed that a person always has the right to decide what is done to their body free from any coercion, pressure, or threat of reprisal. Colleges, airlines, health care providers, and other institutions are violating these freedoms by mandating vaccinations as an entrance or participation requirement. People need to be informed. I highly recommend this powerful interview. You can watch it here.
5 Comments
Carol
6/1/2021 09:46:16 am
Larry, Thank you for your article and for linking the Tucker Carlson interview with Dr. MacDonald in your message....Awesome...I hope that this information is getting out to the public more and more so the truth is being revealed. We must stand up for what it right.
Reply
Jan
6/25/2021 02:59:28 pm
I enjoyed the interview. Thank you. I have a question. There is a lot of information out now regarding the concern with increased transmission and deadliness of the Delta variant and other variants which are now spreading in the U.S. Information I have seen states that vaccine induced immunity has greater immunity against the variants than natural immunity and that natural immunity only provides immunity from the specific original COVID19 virus or specific variant with which an individual had been infected. The information that I have seen states that natural immunity does not provide protection against variants. What information is available on natural immunity against other variants?
Reply
Larry Law
6/26/2021 06:31:28 pm
Hi Jan,
Jan
7/1/2021 12:13:05 pm
Thank you for this information. I need some more guidance After seeing this information, I sent my 24 year daughter the information on natural immunity and encouraging her to get an antibody and/or T-detect COVID test to see if she has had COVID19 so she could avoid getting vaccinated. Since late January 2020 she has had 3 "really bad colds" but never got tested for COVID so there is no proof either way if she has had COVID or not. She has been living her life pretty much as usual (except for coming home to see us) so likely has had opportunity for exposure, plus attended an international conference in Las Vegas late January 2020 where Chinese attended. She had gotten a "really bad cold" within 2 weeks after the conference, My husband had been pushing her to get vaccinated so we can see her and because she will be attending a large indoor retirement party later this month and her grandmother's 100th birthday celebration in early September with us so we do want to protect us, her grandmother and other older adults from potential COVID exposure. She won't mask around family and friends so family hasn't seen her during the pandemic. She said people don't mask where she works. I received both Pfizer vaccines and developed significant inflammation throughout my body, some after the first but serious after my 2nd shot in early April, including my heart and have had significant blood pressure and fast heart rate issues since then. I found out that my daughter had already gotten her first Pfizer vaccine the same day but before she received the information on natural immunity. Now she has a lot of anxiety with her receiving the vaccine and so do I. I'm concerned for her since she hasn't started having children yet with unknown reproductive effects with mRNA vaccines and because of the many health issues I developed after my Pfizer shots. I'm looking for some direction with this and what options there may be in this situation. Is there any data for how much protection will 1 Pfizer shot give her if she only gets one shot? Is getting just the one shot a safe option here? Will one shot set her up to be more susceptible to variants? Will one shot protect the vulnerable adults that she will be around if she is unmasked? What if she delayed the 2nd shot? Are there better side effect outcomes with delaying longer than the 21 days that is currently recommended? I appreciate any input with this. Thank you.
Reply
Larry Law
7/3/2021 09:54:04 pm
HI Jan, After experiencing the first shot, many people opt out of getting the second. When people understand how effective therapeutics (like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine) are in preventing, treating, and curing infection from SARS-CoV-2, they decide not to go the vaccine route for this disease. I would recommend reading the articles on our blog (there is a search box where you can put in "COVID" or "vaccine" and any of the numerous articles written since summer 2020. I think the information will help ease any anxiety you or daughter have. There are real solutions and no one has to give in to the fear engendered by the mainstream media.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
BlogArchives
October 2024
Categories
All
|
© Angie's Option GRM. All rights reserved.