Larry A. Law
The WHO changed their definition of what constitutes a pandemic. The original definition included the text "when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses." The underlined phrase was removed the month prior to the 2009 swine flu pandemic. This change enabled the WHO to classifiy the swine flu as a pandemic, although only 144 people died from the infection worldwide. This also enables the WHO to classify COVID-19 as a pandemic even though it has caused no excess mortality compared to previous years and its lethality is on par with the seasonal flu. SARS-CoV-2 is different in terms of symptoms and complications, but the absolute risk of dying is equivalent to the risk of dying in a car accident.
But something more sneaky and dire in consequences has occurred. In December 2020, the WHO completely altered the definition of herd immunity. Every 9th-grade biology student has learned for the last 75 years that respiratory viruses are either "wide-spread and mostly mild (common cold) or very severe and short-lived." The reason is that when a virus kills its host it cannot spread to others. The more this happens, the less it spreads. This is why there is always an initial 6-week hump of mass infections and unfortunate deaths, but then the virus loses its pandemic quality and becomes manageable. People naturally catch the flu virus, the susceptible sometimes die, but the remainder develop natural immunity and the epidemic wanes. This is Immunology 101.
As late as June 9, 2020, the WHO's website described herd immunity as "the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection." But in mid-November 2020, without any warning, the WHO changed their website and removed any mention of natural immunity. This is why we no longer hear any mention of natural immunity anymore. It has been deleted from the official mainstream vocabulary. It is science relegated to the trashbin because it no longer meets the politically correct viewpoint. Now the WHO defines herd immunity as "a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached." Did you catch that? This is why government officials talk about achieving a 70% vaccination rate. They aren't interested in those who got over COVID-19 and are naturally immune from the disease. They never acknowledge, count, or classify people in that category because they don't care about who recovered from the disease. They want vaccines for all. In addition, the WHO added, "Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it." So much for natural immunity and one hundred years of science! By this unscientific sleight of hand, the WHO now justifies giving everyone the COVID-19 shot regardless of immune status! They are not interested in the science of immunology/virology or that naturally acquired immunity is far superior to vaccine-acquired immunity. By deleting it from their definition, it no longer exists and mainstream media never talks about it. The growing chant is for vaccine passports which authorize privileges to the vaccinated who compliantly submit. The unvaccinated (who actually are the only ones truly immune from the disease and who cannot pass on the disease to others) become the unwashed and are deemed unworthy of mingling with society. A new form of systemic discrimination is being birthed without any public discussion on social media permitted. Today retail stores, churches, and schools accept the recommendations from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) whose main job is to represent the pharmaceutical companies and deliver drugs and vaccines to health care facilities around the country. Between 2014 and 2018, the CDC accepted $79.6 million from drug companies and commercial manufacturers through their government-chartered CDC Foundation. They are not an independent agency--they represent the pharmaceutical industry. It was a surprise when the CDC changed their tune about everyone having to wear masks. Political pressure (questions like, 'why did we get vaccinated if we can't go back to normal and take off the mask?') forced them to relent and allow vaccinated people to take off their masks. But if anyone should wear a mask, the vaccinated are the ones that should because they are not immune! The CDC says masks are mandated for the unvaccinated, including those who have recovered from COVID-19. But unvaccinated COVID survivors are the only ones who are totally and completely immune from the disease--the vaccinated only have a slight reduction in symptoms and can still catch and pass the virus! The emperor has no clothes on and it seems there are many who kowtow to the politically correct narrative. And what is worse, very few are willing to challenge the authorities and demand a scientific discussion of these issues. It has always taken courage to stand up against tyranny. The human immune system God created is not deficient in its ability to protects us. For those who suffer with disease, there are therapeutics that can treat, mitigate and cure COVID-19 as well as other viral infections. People have a right to choose their therapy. A one-size-fits-all vaccine mandate which forces human beings to be injected with chemicals which have not been adequately safety-tested, is unethical and immoral. People who advocate this approach are walking in the same shoes as the Nazis did in World War II. The scientists sponsored by Big Pharma and the WHO conveniently ignore the simple truth that a vaccine can do nothing without the human immune system doing its job. The immune system is designed to become activated by catching the virus in the wild. This powerful system develops a strong, life-long immunity as a result. In the last century, scientists discovered a way to sometimes induce an artificial, mild immunity to a handful of diseases using a synthetic version of the virus. But never forget that a vaccine depends upon the same natural immune system doing its job to develop an immunity to the disease! Without this natural immune system, there is no protection from bacterial or viral infections. With a disease like COVID-19 that 99.98% of the population survives, and for which effective therapuetics exist to treat and cure the disease, what is the point of taking a risky 'vaccine' whose side-effects can be life threatening? The scientific fact is that none of the COVID-19 'vaccines' actually provide immunity. Researchers have never developed a true vaccine for a coronavirus, and that includes the ones on the market today.
The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) data released by the CDC on July 16, 2021 showed a total of 463,457 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 10,991 deaths and 48,385 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 9, 2021. The number of deaths increased AGAIN by 2,000 in just one week! There have been 4,000 reported deaths in just 2 weeks! Remember, VAERS captures less than 1% of all events. During the same two weeks, the number of strictly-COVID-19 deaths was virtually non-existent. This fact begs the question: "Are the health authorities actually looking out for the people's health? Does anyone in the mainstream media care that so many people are dying and being injured by this vaccine? More people have died from this one vaccine than from all vaccines during the last 30 years! It is time for mainstream media to allow a public discussion and permit those choosing to remain unvaccinated (35% of the population) and those hundreds of thousands permanently injured by vaccines to tell their story.
If you need a good laugh to balance all of this heavy stuff, here is a very humorous video you will enjoy by the comedian JP Sears. Hopefully, it won't get taken down too soon!
4 Comments
Mary M Parker
7/21/2021 11:49:23 am
It is said we can "control" government at the ballot box, but now days, that doesn't even work anymore. The above article made so much sense, but I doubt if my doctors will agree with it (and one of them is in our Stake Presidency!).
Reply
Larry Law
7/21/2021 01:57:24 pm
Thanks Mary. It sometimes feels like it's a battle to teach truths especially to people who believe science already knows. I love the revealed definition of truth:"Truth is knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come." Science is trying to find out the truth but seems to constantly change its opinions of what constitutes truth. Sometimes people make appeals to science as if scientists can settle all discussion. But science is very unsettled (as anyone who studies its history can see). The nature of science is always to question and try to learn more (gain deeper insights or disprove erroneous ideas).Truth, however, stands the test of time and is the thing you want to build your foundation on. Truth always brings us back to God and the things He created. When science aligns with truth you can trust it. But the negative is also true.
Reply
submit. The unvaccinated (who actually are the only ones truly immune from the disease and who cannot pass on the disease to others) become the unwashed and are deemed unworthy of mingling with society.
Reply
Larry Law
7/25/2021 09:51:01 pm
Hi Joan,
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
BlogArchives
October 2024
Categories
All
|
© Angie's Option GRM. All rights reserved.