Larry A. Law
All-Cause Mortality (total deaths from all diseases) is Unchanged Throughout the Pandemic
The public has been deliberately lied to. The fatality rate for COVID is 0.096%. That is less than one-tenth of one percent or 1 in 1000 people. Those statistics mirror influenza--it is just another flu where the elderly and the sick are the first to succumb. Every death is sad, but this was never a real pandemic. The all-cause mortality (number of deaths from all causes of illness) rate has not increased at all. There is no pandemic of excessive deaths--the same number of people are dying as they do every year.
PCR is a Bad Test
Never in the history of medicine have we diagnosed anyone with a disease who isn't sick! How many people were diagnosed with COVID-19 who were asymptomatic--not sick? The vast majority! Why would you trust the sequence of genetic material that came from the laboratory in Wuhan accused of engineering the virus through gain-of-function to be more dangerous? Why did they keep testing people and amplifying the material found at a ridiculously high rate that ensured 98% false positives? Why did they count everyone who tested positive within a 28-day window as a COVID death even if they died in a car accident? Yeadon shares that there were even stories of hospitals swabbing people in the morgue for COVID to increase their numbers. Such manipulations ensured higher incomes for hospitals, as they received a bonus (of some $30,000) per 'COVID mortality'. The genetic sequence used by the PCR test can stay in the human body for months and even years. In 2009, the influenza pandemic (swine flu) used the same bad PCR test. When they fixed the test, the pandemic went away. Yeadon says that it looked like a dry run for the 2019 COVID pandemic. Those in power knew the PCR test was faulty, but they refused to fix it until President Biden was inaugurated in January 2021.
No One Designs a Vaccine for the Elderly
Vaccines are created primarily for young people to activate their immune system to create antibodies for a particular disease. Most of the elderly have sentient immune systems that are suppressed and worn out from age, disease and taking multiple medications. Trying to stimulate an already weakened immune system with a COVID vaccine doesn't work. Experience with the elderly has proven that the flu vaccine offers no substantive protection; it does not generate the same immune response and offers no substantive protection because their immune systems are muted. Vaccine manufacturers are primarily intent on making money through the increased sale of drugs and won't readily share that information.
Three Vaccine Design Flaws
There were three egregious design errors committed by COVID mRNA vaccine developers who, according to Yeadon, should have known better.
1) It wasn't a good idea to pick the spike protein for the mRNA vaccine. 90% of human immunity comes from two other parts of the virus, not the spike protein. The spike protein is the most toxic part and causes blood clots by itself. Forcing the cells to replicate and produce synthetic versions of it is madness as it causes irreparable harm.
2) They knew the spike protein would not be stable because it mutates. The vaccine would be outdated and ineffective quickly. Viral variants would explode on the scene. They knew the vaccine would be useless against these variants.
3) They should have chosen a part of the virus that is most different from humans but not toxic. Forcing the creation of artificial spike proteins among the millions of other human glycoproteins is likely to cause the immune system to generate an autoimmune attack which will target all cells containing these fake glycoproteins. Autoimmune disease would likely become rampant.
Yeadon says that to inject these mRNA vaccines is like putting a brick on the accelerator of a go-cart that has no steering wheel and no brake. The mRNA would travel everywhere in the body especially targeting nerve tissue, the brain and eyes, the heart and blood vessels, ovaries and testes. Since vaccine-generated antibodies are in the blood and look inside the body for problems, they don't go to the surface epithelial cells (in air passageways in the lungs and throat) to stop the virus from infecting you. They are inward (not outward) looking. That is why vaccines are not a good solution to stop infection or transmission--they don't work that way!
COVID Vaccine mRNA Was Altered to Stay in the Body Much Longer than Normal
Dr. Stephanie Seneff, an MIT researcher states that "the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines do not mimic natural infection at all." Compared to natural mRNA that quickly degrades in the cell, the mRNA from the COVID-19 vaccines has been shown to take 2-6 months to degrade, even though the manufacturers promised that degradation would occur in a few days. “They were so worried about the mRNA not lasting long enough [to induce an immune response] that they way overdid it, I think,” Seneff says.
To make the vaccine mRNA more stable, Moderna and Pfizer changed the chemical bases that make up the artificial, genetically-modified strand of RNA. The original RNA strand in the virus is made up of 36 percent guanine (G) and cytosine (C) DNA bases. mRNA low in G and C bases is less stable and degrade faster; Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines had this percentage raised to 53 and 61 respectively. Previous experiments showed that genes with higher G and C content were more likely to be read and their information made into proteins. Having a high G content also increases the speed at which the gene is read, but faster reading also means more likelihood of errors, and a higher chance of glycoprotein misfolding leading to autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases. This means that not only will this mRNA instruction remain in the cell longer for its information to be made into synthetic spike proteins, but cells will also preferentially express information from the vaccine mRNA instead of other normal cellular metabolic processes. All these 'errors' magnify the opportunity for adverse events.
Proof Vaccine Was Intentionally Meant to Cause Harm--What is the Likelihood?
So, what are the chances that scientific developers would violate all of these known, vaccine design rules for creating a safe and effective product? What are the chances that all 4 companies (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson) would steer their vaccine development in the same way and violate these design principles? What are the chances that health officials in every country around the world (except Sweden) would embrace these vaccines and administer them without regard for human safety? The fact that smart people across multiple nations at the same time allowed this illogical, anti-science approach indicates extreme malfeasance and collusion. Yeadon's arguments are so powerful, rational, and well thought out that is seems impossible to reach any other conclusion. Some force (like the World Economic Forum) must have exerted extreme pressure to implement this approach and silence all dissent. It is a shame that so many people, who we entrust to guard our health, would not lift a warning voice at all. But the good news is that there are hundreds of thousands who risked and continue to risk employment, freedom and their good name to fight against the injustice and to shout as loudly as they can that these vaccines are not safe and effective.